Re: pg_ctl -t N register ?? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: pg_ctl -t N register ??
Date
Msg-id 20071116191728.GB12131@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_ctl -t N register ??  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I just noticed that the "pg_ctl register" synopsis was updated to have a
> > -t parameter.  This does not seem to make sense to me.  Is it correct?
> > Does it do anything?
> > 
> > My thinking is that we should just remove the -t from that synopsis.
> 
> Well, Peter added it, but register already had the -w parameter, so
> either register needs both -t and -w, or it needs neither of them.  I
> don't know which is true.

Humm, in pgwin32_CommandLine I don't see any reference to -t but -w is
there.  So either

a) the bug is that somebody forgot to add -t to pgwin32_CommandLine
b) the bug is that -t was added to the synopsis, or
c) I'm full of it because of an untold reason.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                  http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/5ZYLFMCVHXC
"En las profundidades de nuestro inconsciente hay una obsesiva necesidad
de un universo lógico y coherente. Pero el universo real se halla siempre
un paso más allá de la lógica" (Irulan)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Call for translations