Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3
Date
Msg-id 473DD714.2080609@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> 
> - --On Friday, November 16, 2007 11:10:09 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 
> wrote:
> 
>>  I'm really not
>> too sure what the functional incompatibilities between versions are,
>> but given the extent of line-by-line diffs I've seen in the output of
>> even adjacent versions, this isn't a question I want to take lightly.
> 
> Just curious, but isn't that something the buildfarm would be good for? 
> generate/commit a 6.1 version of configure, and see if any of hte buildfarm 
> environments break ... or am I missing something 'post-install' that could be 
> affected?

Maybe the BF members could just run their default autoconf as part of 
the build if they have one.

/D


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3