I've played with both parameters but it doesn't help in this case
Thanks
-----Message d'origine-----
De=A0: Heikki Linnakangas [mailto:hlinnaka@gmail.com] De la part de Heikki =
Linnakangas
Envoy=E9=A0: 6 ao=FBt 2007 16:58
=C0=A0: Mouhamadou Dia
Cc=A0: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Objet=A0: Re: RE : RE : [BUGS] BUG #3519: Postgres takes the wrong query pl=
an resulting in performance issues
Hmm. I don't see anything terribly wrong in the planner's estimates. The
only estimate that's off is the # of rows in pror_org matching the qual
orgt_cd =3D 'CHAIN', 27 estimated vs 1 actual. You could try increasing
the statistics target for that column to get that estimate right. That
might tip the planner to choose a plan with nested loop joins instead of
hash joins.
Have you played with enable_seqscan=3Doff or enable_hashjoin=3Doff? That's
not a good long term solution, but it would be interesting to see what
happens.
Mouhamadou Dia wrote:
> Sorry,
> This output is coming from PG 8.1.19
> I'm attaching the one that is coming from 8.2.4
> Thanks and sorry for the confusion
>=20
>=20
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Heikki Linnakangas [mailto:hlinnaka@gmail.com] De la part de Heikki =
Linnakangas
> Envoy=E9 : 6 ao=FBt 2007 15:32
> =C0 : Mouhamadou Dia
> Cc : pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
> Objet : Re: RE : [BUGS] BUG #3519: Postgres takes the wrong query plan re=
sulting in performance issues
>=20
> Mouhamadou Dia wrote:
>> I'm sending in attachment the output of the explain analyze command and =
the create table statements of tables involved in the query.
>=20
> Wait, you said that the query takes 20 seconds on 8.2, but the explain
> analyze output says that it actually took 50 seconds. Is this the output
> from 8.2.4?
>=20
--=20
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
