>>Some of the data required by the check function
>>is being restored after the data being checked
>>by the function and so it all fails the constraint.
>
>Are you saying that the check function perform queries against other
>data? That might not be a good idea -- consider what happens if
>the data changes: would changes invalidate records that had previously
>passed the check but that wouldn't pass now if they were checked
>again?
You ask some great questions. Thanks.
I think maybe I just got a little constraint-happy. The way I have
it, there is definitely a possibility for the other data to change
out from under the constraint. That can't be good.
Right now, I don't really see another way to check what I wanted
to check, so I am just going to remove the constraint.
When I get a few minutes, I will post my simplified example and
maybe someone will have a good idea.
Thanks again.
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
