>
>Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> > Well, you can implement it. After all, the CALL syntax is merely
> > syntactic sugar. You could (if you wanted to) do the following:
>
> > CREATE FUNCTION foo( a TEXT IN, b TEXT INOUT, c TEXT OUT ) as blah...
>
> > And in a pl/pgsql function, translate: "CALL foo(a,b,c)"
> > into "(b,c) = foo(a,b)" internally.
>
>No, Pavel's right: that doesn't work because it's ambiguous. How do you
>tell whether "CALL foo(a,b,c)" means
>
> a,b,c := foo();
> b,c := foo(a);
> c := foo(a,b);
> select foo(a,b,c);
>
>There could be functions foo matching all four interpretations.
we can do some hints:
CALL foo(a, OUT b, OUT c)
it's better than nothing
comments?
Regards
Pavel Stehule
_________________________________________________________________
Citite se osamele? Poznejte nekoho vyjmecneho diky Match.com.
http://www.msn.cz/
