vacuumlo issue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From MUHAMMAD ASIF
Subject vacuumlo issue
Date
Msg-id BAY164-W265A089BD32F8901A686C9FF430@phx.gbl
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: vacuumlo issue  (MUHAMMAD ASIF <anaeem.it@hotmail.com>)
Re: vacuumlo issue  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: vacuumlo issue  ("Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

We have noticed the following issue with vacuumlo database that have millions of record in pg_largeobject i.e.
   WARNING:  out of shared memoryFailed to remove lo 155987:    ERROR:  out of shared memory   HINT:  You might need to
increasemax_locks_per_transaction. 
Why do we need to increase max_locks_per_transaction/shared memory for clean up operation, if there are huge number
recordshow can we tackle this situation with limited memory?. It is reproducible on postgresql-9.1.2. The steps are as
following(PFA vacuumlo-test_data.sql that generates dummy data)  i.e.  

Steps: 
1. ./bin/initdb -D data-vacuumlo_test12. ./bin/pg_ctl -D data-vacuumlo_test1 -l logfile_data-vacuumlo_test1 start3.
./bin/createdbvacuumlo_test4. bin/psql -d vacuumlo_test -f vacuumlo-test_data.sql5. bin/vacuumlo vacuumlo_test 

~/work/pg/postgresql-9.1.2/inst$ bin/psql -d vacuumlo_test -f vacuumlo-test_data.sql
CREATE FUNCTION
CREATE FUNCTION
 create_manylargeobjects
-------------------------
 
(1 row)
 count
-------
 13001
(1 row)

~/work/pg/postgresql-9.1.2/inst$ bin/vacuumlo vacuumlo_test

WARNING:  out of shared memory
Failed to remove lo 36726: ERROR:  out of shared memory

HINT:  You might need to increase max_locks_per_transaction.
Failed to remove lo 36727: ERROR:  current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block
Failed to remove lo 36728: ERROR:  current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block
Failed to remove lo 36729: ERROR:  current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block
....
....


Best Regards,Muhammad Asif Naeem


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE DOMAIN json vs built-in json
Next
From: MUHAMMAD ASIF
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuumlo issue