Re: Vacuum problem - Mailing list pgsql-general

From S H
Subject Re: Vacuum problem
Date
Msg-id BAY155-W585FADC7C7BDF9F8ED02F7FDAE0@phx.gbl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vacuum problem  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
I confirmed that there is no bloating unfortunately. 

Did some experiment and it seems that connection open are always slow in case of vacuuming.. 

- Experiment done are as follows:-
- Do frequent vacuuming.
- Execute xx connections every min and close after one sec.
- when vacuum is running connection open takes time.

I can almost 100% reduce it when my database size is 30 MB only with 1.5 bloating. 

> Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 10:54:04 -0600
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum problem
> From: scott.marlowe@gmail.com
> To: msq001@live.com
> CC: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
>
> Not saying you HAVE bloating there, saying you MIGHT.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: cal I pass arguments directly to final function in aggregates
Next
From: Julian
Date:
Subject: Re: Best practice on inherited tables