Re: Why does not perform index combination - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Adnan DURSUN
Subject Re: Why does not perform index combination
Date
Msg-id BAY106-DAV1859B44CE7651F57F20E10FAFB0@phx.gbl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Why does not perform index combination  ("Adnan DURSUN" <a_dursun@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
>From: Tom Lane
>Date: 02/16/06 19:29:21
>Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Why does not perform index combination
 
>"Adnan DURSUN" <a_dursun@hotmail.com> writes:
>>   I have query for a report. Explain analyze result is below. The =
>> execution plan tells that it would use "t_koltuk_islem_pkey" index on =
>> table "t_koltuk_islem" to scan. However, there is another index on table =
>> "t_koltuk_islem" on column "islem_tarihi" that can be combined on plan. =
>> Why doesn't optimizer choice that ? It prefer to perform a filter on =
>> column "islem_tarihi" ... Why ?
 
>Probably thinks that the extra index doesn't add enough selectivity to
>be worth scanning.  It's probably right, too --- maybe with a narrower
>date range the answer would be different.
 
    Yes, a narrower date range solves that.. Thanks for your suggestions...
 
>I think the main problem in this plan is the poor estimation of the size
>of the d1/s join.  Are your stats up to date on those tables?  Maybe
>boosting the statistics target for one or both would help.
 
    Database was vacuumed and analyzed before got take the plan..
 
Regards
Adnan DURSUN
 

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: qsort again (was Re: Strange Create Index
Next
From: Mark Lewis
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] qsort again (was Re: Strange Create Index