primary key and existing unique fields - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Sally Sally
Subject primary key and existing unique fields
Date
Msg-id BAY101-F32W8BYXifWo0000151b@hotmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: primary key and existing unique fields  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: primary key and existing unique fields  (Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42@gmail.com>)
Re: primary key and existing unique fields  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
List pgsql-general
Hi all,
I am wandering about the pros and cons of creating a separate serial field
for a primary key when I already have a single unique field. This existing
unique field will have to be a character of fixed length (VARCHAR(12))
because although it's a numeric value there will be leading zeroes. There
are a couple more tables with similar unique fields and one of them would
need to reference the others. Does anybody see any good reason for adding a
separate autoincrement primary key field for each table? or either way is
not a big deal.
Sally

_________________________________________________________________
Don�t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: PgSQL MVCC vs MySQL InnoDB
Next
From: Duane Lee - EGOVX
Date:
Subject: Re: primary key and existing unique fields