<br /><blockquote cite="mid22369.1153492213@sss.pgh.pa.us" type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">On Fri, Jul
21,2006 at 01:42:26PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">I would prefer to
dropthe PG_ prefixes on PG_TRACE and pg_trace.h. We
know which software we're dealing with. </pre></blockquote></blockquote><pre wrap=""> </pre><blockquote
type="cite"><prewrap="">I don't know. "trace" is a fairly generic word, how do you know that
none of the dozen other libraries we include don't already have a
"trace.h" or a TRACE() macro? On any of our supported platforms? </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
I concur with Martijn. We've already regretted using ERROR as a macro
name, let's not make the same mistake with TRACE. PG_TRACE is good,
and so is pg_trace.h. (But invoking it as utils/trace.h would be ok.)
</pre></blockquote> How about the obvious DTRACE( .... ) or some similar variant?<br /><br /> -- Korry<br /><br
/>
