On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie jun 03 12:44:45 -0400 2011:
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > (4) It strikes me that it might be possible to address this problem a
>> > bit more cleanly by allowing mdnblocks() and smgrnblocks() and
>> > RelationGetNumberOfBlocksInFork() to take a boolean argument
>> > indicating whether or not an error should be thrown if the underlying
>> > physical file happens not to exist. When no error is to be signaled,
>> > we simply return 0 when the main fork doesn't exist, rather than
>> > throwing an error.
>>
>> If we don't want to gum this with the above-mentioned cruft, the other
>> obvious alternative here is to do nothing, and live with the
>> non-beauty of the resulting error message.
>
> Option 4 seems reasonable to me ... can you get rid of the dupe
> smgrnblocks call simultaneously?
What dup smgrnblocks call?
Patch along these lines attached.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
