On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 21:29 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
>> If I'm not mistaken about this, that would imply that we also cannot
>> have two range types with the same base type, the same opclass,
>> but different collations. Which seems rather unfortunate... In fact,
>> if that's true, maybe restricing range types to the database collation
>> would be best...
>
> Yes, we cannot have two range types with the same base type. That is a
> consequence of the polymorphic type system, which needs to be able to
> determine the range type given the base type.
Boy, that's an unfortunate limitation. :-(
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
