On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Federico Di Gregorio
<federico.digregorio@dndg.it> wrote:
> It is just half of the fix. You can't assume that switching to
> autocommit will do an implicit ROLLBACK for you. This worked until now
> by chance (and because some drivers share the same logic and even some
> code) but will break with new drivers or when old drivers decide to
> "fix" the switch as we did for psycopg. So, IMHO, the best thing is to
> always call .rollback() before switching transaction level.
OK, thanks.
Couple more questions if you don't mind:
Are there any backwards-compatability implications here? It seems not:
if prior versions of psycopg2 implicitly issued a ROLLBACK upon
switching to autocommit then we're just making that explicit. Nobody
using an older version of psycopg2 will get burned by a "new"
ROLLBACK, right?
Second, is `conn.set_isolation_level(0)` the right invocation even in
the light of the new `set_session()` API? I'd prefer to use
`set_isolation_level` because it's backwards compatible, but if it's
going away in some future version of psycopg2 I don't want to have a
similar problem crop up later. Is `set_isolation_level` considered a
stable method?
Thanks again!
Jacob
