I am wondering If I am missing something obvious. If not, I have a suggestion for plpgsql. Stored procedures can accept rows.Libpq can receive rows (PQResult). Wouldn’t it be a great interface if PQResult was “bi-directional”? Create a result set on the client then call the database with a command. Perhaps… PQinsert(PQResult,”schema.table”); //iterate thru rows inserting PQupdate(PQResult,”schema.table”); //iterate thru rows updateing
I am wondering If I am missing something obvious. If not, I have a suggestion for plpgsql.
Stored procedures can accept rows.
Libpq can receive rows (PQResult).
Wouldn’t it be a great interface if PQResult was “bi-directional”? Create a result set on the client then call the database with a command.
Perhaps…
PQinsert(PQResult,”schema.table”); //iterate thru rows inserting
PQupdate(PQResult,”schema.table”); //iterate thru rows updateing
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных