Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off
Date
Msg-id BANLkTinO57O7V2RfXZ-ou5Hx-xS_DPJepw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 00:21, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 05:39, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> I wouldn't have a problem with making the Windows port throw an error
>>> for "local" lines.  We'd have to fix initdb to remove that line from the
>>> sample file (if it doesn't already), but that's surely not hard.
>
>> It does already (that's what the @remove-line-for-nolocal@ markup in
>> the sample file is for).
>
>> So +1 for making it throw an error.
>
> Although this should be a simple change, I don't want to do it because
> I'm not in a position to test it.  Do you want to take care of it?

Here's a patch that I think does what we want. It works fine on
Windows - I just want to make sure this is what you meant as well?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested CASE-WHEN scoping
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: SSI predicate locking on heap -- tuple or row?