On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> Incidentally, I used the term "local lock" because I assumed fast-path locks
> would still go through the lock manager far enough to populate the local lock
> table. But there may be no reason to do so.
Oh, good point. I think we probably WOULD need to update the local
lock lock hash table.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
