Hi Robert,
> does this work for you?
> select u.id from (your unions) as u order by u.id
Unfourtunatly not, it converts my union-results from INTEGER to RECORD.
However, it seems to be possible to order the unions directly:
> result1 UNION result2 ORDER BY u.id
Hmm, the query plan looks really insane for this ... wonder how it
will perform when the tables will not be mostly empty ;)
Thanks, Clemens
