Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Date
Msg-id BANLkTin49Z+7BSO5NHu4ay6w3jn=rAM1Yw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Test case please. I don't understand the problem you're describing.

S1: select * from foo;
S2: begin;
S2: alter table foo alter column a set storage plain;
S1: select * from foo;
<blocks>

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: FWD: fastlock+lazyvzid patch performance
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_locks documentation vs. SSI