On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> I believe, however, that applying this will invalidate the contents of
>> any hash indexes on array types that anyone has built using 9.1beta1.
>> Do we need to do something about that?
>
> Like bumping catversion?
Sure. Although note that the system catalogs are not actually
changing, which goes to someone else's recent point about catversion
getting bumped for things other than changes in the things for which
the "cat" in "catversion" is an abbreviation.
> I would probably complain about that, except you already did it post-beta1:
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=9bb6d9795253bb521f81c626fea49a704a369ca9
Unfortunately, I was unable to make that omelet without breaking some eggs. :-(
> Possibly Bruce will feel like adding a check to pg_upgrade for the case.
> I wouldn't bother myself though. It seems quite unlikely that anyone's
> depending on the feature yet.
I'll leave that to you, Bruce, and whoever else wants to weigh in to
hammer that one out.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
