Re: Shared Buffer Size - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Derrick Rice
Subject Re: Shared Buffer Size
Date
Msg-id BANLkTimXs8X4ALvF4Wo2+yJGux2iO=aSZA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Shared Buffer Size  (preetika tyagi <preetikatyagi@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Shared Buffer Size  (preetika tyagi <preetikatyagi@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Check out the "Inside the PostgreSQL Buffer Cache" link here:

http://projects.2ndquadrant.com/talks

Thanks to Greg Smith (active here).

Derrick

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:36 PM, preetika tyagi <preetikatyagi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,

I am little confused about the internal working of PostgreSQL. There is a parameter shared_buffer in postgres.conf and I am assuming that it is used for buffer management in PostgreSQL. If there is a need to bring in a new page in the buffer and size exceeds the shared_buffer limit, a victim dirty page will be written back to the disk.

However, I have read on many links that PostgreSQL depends on the OS for caching. (http://www.varlena.com/GeneralBits/Tidbits/perf.html#shbuf)

So my question is, the actual limit of the shared buffer will be defined by OS or the shared_buffer parameter in the postgres.conf to figure whether a victim dirty page needs to be selected for disk write or not?

Thanks!

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "David Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: SELECT COUNT(*) execution time on large tables (v9.0.4-1)
Next
From: "Little, Douglas"
Date:
Subject: String library