Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed
Date
Msg-id BANLkTikkMMPBW_EnjnysHv_MAnyfjtasJg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 19:45, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jun 28 10:39:22 -0400 2011:
>
>> I think it would be sensible to block branch removal, as there's
>> basically never a scenario where we'd do that during current usage.
>> I'm not excited about blocking branch addition, although I worry
>> sooner or later somebody will accidentally push a private development
>> branch :-(.  Is it possible to block only removal and not addition?
>
> If we can tweak the thing, how about we only allow creating branches
> that match a certain pattern, say ^REL_\d+_\d+_STABLE$?

I've put this in place - except I used ^REL\d+... and not what you
suggested, since that's how we name our branches :P

I'm going to push an actual valid branch, let's say 9.7, and then
remove it again, just to make sure things worked (with it installed I
cannot push an invalid branch, so i can't test the branch removal
block). So don't panic if you see that one :)

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Process local hint bit cache
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed