Re: alter table without an ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Andreas Berger
Subject Re: alter table without an ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock
Date
Msg-id BANLkTikh0czdScJ2mKR7XPYZkregdinfOA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to alter table without an ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock  (Andreas Berger <4postgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Thanks for your answer!
In this spacial case your suggestion is a solution, but I am searching
for an opportunity to make every change (e.g. alter table) without
effecting availability of the database and the modified table when using
wal shipping (maybe something like concurrently when creating an index).
When using skytools I can keep the downtime minimal by doing a master
slave change after modifying the slave db. But the question now is, is
it possible to use wal shipping without having downtimes when modifying
tables?

regards,
Andi


On 2011-06-16 20:21, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andreas Berger <4postgres@gmail.com> writes:
>> i'm searching for a solution for changing the type of a column, e.g. from
>> varchar(128) to varchar(512), without an ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock.
> 
> That specific case (increasing the max length of a varchar column) could
> be handled by hacking the pg_attribute.atttypmod entry for the column,
> since no change in the actual data is required.
> 
> However, I have no idea whether your replication environment would cope
> with such a change --- experimenting on a non-production setup would be
> highly recommendable.
> 
> 			regards, tom lane

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "Martin Münstermann"
Date:
Subject: archive_command vs. cp -i
Next
From: Nicolas Thauvin
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and drop table if exists statement