Re: GSoC proposal: Fast GiST index build - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: GSoC proposal: Fast GiST index build
Date
Msg-id BANLkTikJOUG3tFjKmRvQ9kuZSwLZM4XdQg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GSoC proposal: Fast GiST index build  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: GSoC proposal: Fast GiST index build  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Project name
> Fast GiST index build

Would/could/should this be implemented in a manner similar to the
existing "GIN fast update" feature?

I've mentioned this problem in item #2 in project details. In short. Problem is in concurrent selects. Buffers size is significant and their scan in concurrent select can cause significant slow down. Probably, compromise can be achived by using for smaller buffers or something like this, but it's topic of separate research. It doesn't seems to be feasible for me to give a production solution of this problem during GSoC.

----
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: q-gram GIN and GiST indexes
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Support comments on FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER and SERVER objects.