Re: hint bit cache v5 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: hint bit cache v5
Date
Msg-id BANLkTikCfhF0R_CthDyoH7PGHGeJ5ceQng@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: hint bit cache v5  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: hint bit cache v5
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:

> Following are results that are fairly typical of the benefits you
> might see when the optimization kicks in.  The attached benchmark just

> [hbcache]
> real    3m35.549s

> [HEAD]
> real    4m24.216s

These numbers look very good. Thanks for responding to my request.

What people have said historically at this point is "ah, but you've
just deferred the pain from clog lookups".

The best way to show this does what we hope is to run a normal-ish
OLTP access to the table that would normally thrash the clog and show
no ill effects there either. Run that immediately after the above
tests so that the cache and hint bits are both primed.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: pg_upgrade and PGPORT
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT