Re: Pull up aggregate subquery - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Pull up aggregate subquery
Date
Msg-id BANLkTik=vohzbxFM1k=Oe4ChgW9xA3DgEQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pull up aggregate subquery  (Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Pull up aggregate subquery  (Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/5/25 Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>:
>> So I'm still
>> thinking which of pulling up and parameterized scan is better.
>
> After more investigation I came up with third idea, pushing down
> RangeTblEntry to aggregate subquery. This sounds like a crazy idea,
> but it seems to me like it is slightly easier than pulling up
> agg-subquery. The main point is that when you want to pull up, you
> must care if the final output would be correct with other join
> relations than the aggregate-related one. In contrast, when pushing
> down the target relation to agg-subquery it is simple to ensure the
> result.
>
> I'm looking around pull_up_subqueries() in subquery_planner() to add
> the pushing down logic. It could be possible to do it around
> make_one_rel() but I bet query structure changes are doable against
> Query, not PlannerInfo.

How do you decide whether or not to push down?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: tackling full page writes
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing overhead of frequent table locks