Re: PGC_S_DEFAULT is inadequate - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: PGC_S_DEFAULT is inadequate
Date
Msg-id BANLkTik1Qqjs+hAKbCmXN191vBEMwSaMdA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PGC_S_DEFAULT is inadequate  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PGC_S_DEFAULT is inadequate  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> So this is fine if the
> current value was from the file or was the boot_val, but if we'd
> overridden the boot value with a "replacement" default value using
> PGC_S_DEFAULT, that code would cause the value to revert to the boot_val
> not the replacement value.  Not desirable.

Doesn't this mean if you had a setting of timezone in your config file
and remove it and reload you'll get a different value than you would
have if you had actually booted without the line originally?


> My conclusion about all this is that we really need to invent another
> GucSource value falling between PGC_S_DEFAULT and PGC_S_ENV_VAR, called
> perhaps PGC_S_DYNAMIC_DEFAULT

LGTM



--
greg


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: the big picture for index-only scans
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: the big picture for index-only scans