On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> The attached patch merges synchronous_replication into synchronous_commit.
>> Committed
>
> Without discussion? I would think that this patch is stepping on the
> other one toes and that maybe would need to make a decision about sync
> rep behavior before to commit this change.
Hmm.. I think that we reached the consensus about merging two GUCs
in previous discussion. You argue that synchronization level should be
controlled in separate two parameters?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
