On Mar 26, 2016, at 7:40 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> It would be nice if we could find a less broad brush approach to dealing with the issue.
I don't know how doable this is, but could we use the existing mechanism of marking an index invalid if it contains an
enumtype to which a value was added, and the transaction was rolled back? For the 90% use case, that would be
acceptable,I would expect.
--
-- Christophe Pettus xof@thebuild.com