Re: [PATCH] Space reservation v02 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [PATCH] Space reservation v02
Date
Msg-id B9A4A833-C199-402A-8F6C-12F21AB10DD8@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Space reservation v02  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jan 31, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com > wrote:

> Robert Haas wrote:
>> People who upgrade via pg_dump will automatically get the new and
>> improved widget type because that is what is now called widget.  But
>> people who in-place upgrade will end up with the old_shitty_widget
>> type.  Then you just run some dead simple postupdate script that goes
>> through and issues ALTER TABLE commands to change each
>> old_shitty_widget column to a widget column.
>
> Altering column type with ALTER TABLE needs to exclusively-lock and  
> rewrite the whole table, so you might as well pg_dump+restore that  
> table.

Not at all.  Lots of DDL operations take table locks, but they're  
still a lot more convenient than dump+restore. Think dependencies.

A stickier wicket is how to handle functions and views that depend on  
the old type, so maybe this isn't quite as clean as I thought.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Hot standby, recovery infra
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: foreign_data test fails with non-C locale