On Dec 11, 2012, at 6:48, Zbigniew <zbigniew2011@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/12/11, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda <acamari@the00z.org>:
>
>> Obviously, it's not fast...
>
> Well, the problem was exactly speed-related. If not this - I could
> simply dispose of the transaction...
> --
> regards,
> Zbigniew
>
>
It seems like if you switched to the COPY API and a staging table your initial performance would be maximized and from
thedelta gain you can run the second transformation query. Your desired feature probably wouldn't work with copy
anywayand high-performance bulk loading should use that API.
David J.
