ways to force index use? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Seth Ladd
Subject ways to force index use?
Date
Msg-id B6A1D046-FDD7-11D7-A960-000A9576D038@picklematrix.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: ways to force index use?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Re: ways to force index use?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
Hello,

Thanks to all the previous suggestions for my previous question.  I've
done a lot more research and playing around since then, and luckily I
think I have a better understanding of postgresql.

I still have some queries that don't use an index, and I was wondering
if there were some other tricks to try out?

My system: RH9, PG 7.3.4, IDE, 1 gig RAM, celeron 1.7
My Table Columns (all bigints): start, stop, step1, step2, step3
My Indexes: btree(start), btree(stop), btree(start, stop)
Size of table: 16212 rows
Params: shared_buffers = 128, effective_cache_size = 8192

The Query: explain analyze select * from path where start = 653873 or
start = 649967 or stop = 653873 or stop = 649967

The Result:
Seq Scan on "path"  (cost=0.00..450.22 rows=878 width=48) (actual time=0
.08..40.50 rows=1562 loops=1)
 Filter: (("start" = 653873) OR ("start" = 649967) OR (stop = 653873) OR
 (stop = 649967))
Total runtime: 42.41 msec

Does anyone have a suggestion on how to get that query to use an index?
  Is it even possible?  I did run vacuum analyze right before this test.

I'm only beginning to customize the parameters in postgresql.conf
(mainly from tips from this list).

Thanks very much!
Seth


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sun performance - Major discovery!
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: ways to force index use?