Regarding Checkpoint Redo Record - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Regarding Checkpoint Redo Record
Date
Msg-id B6907F5537A1430AABC57E0C928ABE4A@china.huawei.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Regarding Checkpoint Redo Record  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
<div class="Section1"><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial">Why PostgreSQL needs to write WAL record for Checkpoint when it maintains same information in
pg_controlfile?</span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;
 
font-family:Arial">This may be required in case we need information about more than one checkpoint as pg_control can
holdinformation of only recent checkpoint. But I could not think of a case where more than one checkpoint information
willbe required.</span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;
 
font-family:Arial">Could anybody let me know the cases where it is required.  </span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font
face="TimesNew Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:
 
12.0pt"> </span></font></div>

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Regarding Checkpoint Redo Record