Testing strlcpy () - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Strong, David
Subject Testing strlcpy ()
Date
Msg-id B6419AF36AC8524082E1BC17DA2506E802579E26@USMV-EXCH2.na.uis.unisys.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
We've completed some tests comparing Postgres 8.2beta1 (beta1) and Postgres 8.2beta1 with strlcpy () (strlcpy).
First and foremost, the patch seems to be stable - we have not run into any issues with it.
After a database reload, there is an 11% difference between strlcpy and beta1 - strlcpy (107 TPS) performing ~11%
betterthan beta1 (96 TPS). This seems to be consistent over a number of runs. Originally, we had only seen 3%
differencehere. 
After 8 (or so) runs, the difference between the two versions disappears and both versions produce ~250 TPS. Both
versions,over time, spend more and more time in LWLockAcquire.  
David


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Henry B. Hotz"
Date:
Subject: Re: JAVA Support
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Nulls, arrays, records, IS NULL, IS DISTINCT FROM