Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From NISHIYAMA Tomoaki
Subject Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64
Date
Msg-id B6000E7D-8C8C-4610-AEFC-A8630D46F713@staff.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

> FYI I've been testing with the attached patch.
> We'll need to construct a configure test for HAVE_CRTDEFS_H.

Isn't it enough to add the name in configure.in and run autoconf to
update configure and autoheaders to update pg_config.h.in?
The check of win32 before large file perhaps should also go to configure.in,
otherwise they would be wiped with next autoconf.

The patch recreated with removing the #undef
but adding the conditional to skip AC_SYS_LARGEFILE in configure.in and
update configure by autoconf.





On 2011/12/09, at 2:46, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

>
>
> On 12/05/2011 06:27 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>
>>   $ cat regression.diffs
>>   ***
>>   C:/MinGW/msys/1.0/home/pgrunner/bf/root32/HEAD/pgsql/src/test/regress/expected/float8-exp-three-digits-win32.out
  Fri Nov 25 14:24:49 2011 
>>   ---
>>   C:/MinGW/msys/1.0/home/pgrunner/bf/root32/HEAD/pgsql/src/test/regress/results/float8.out      Mon Dec  5 18:17:36
2011
>>   ***************
>>   *** 382,388 ****
>>         SET f1 = FLOAT8_TBL.f1 * '-1'
>>         WHERE FLOAT8_TBL.f1 > '0.0';
>>      SELECT '' AS bad, f.f1 * '1e200' from FLOAT8_TBL f;
>>   ! ERROR:  value out of range: overflow
>>      SELECT '' AS bad, f.f1 ^ '1e200' from FLOAT8_TBL f;
>>      ERROR:  value out of range: overflow
>>      SELECT 0 ^ 0 + 0 ^ 1 + 0 ^ 0.0 + 0 ^ 0.5;
>>   --- 382,396 ----
>>         SET f1 = FLOAT8_TBL.f1 * '-1'
>>         WHERE FLOAT8_TBL.f1 > '0.0';
>>      SELECT '' AS bad, f.f1 * '1e200' from FLOAT8_TBL f;
>>   !  bad |     ?column?
>>   ! -----+------------------
>>   !      |                0
>>   !      |      -3.484e+201
>>   !      |     -1.0043e+203
>>   !      |        -Infinity
>>   !      | -1.2345678901234
>>   ! (5 rows)
>>   !
>>      SELECT '' AS bad, f.f1 ^ '1e200' from FLOAT8_TBL f;
>>      ERROR:  value out of range: overflow
>>      SELECT 0 ^ 0 + 0 ^ 1 + 0 ^ 0.0 + 0 ^ 0.5;
>>
>>   ======================================================================
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> This is apparently an optimization bug in the compiler. If I turn optimization off (CFLAGS=-O0) it goes away. Ick.
>
> So at the moment I'm a bit blocked. I can't really file a bug because the compiler can't currently be used to build
postgres,I don't have time to construct a self-contained test case, and I don't want to commit changes to enable the
compileruntil the issue is solved. 
>
> FYI I've been testing with the attached patch. We'll need to construct a configure test for HAVE_CRTDEFS_H.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
> <mingw-w64-32.patch>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem
Next
From: Joachim Wieland
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only