Re: FAQ -- Index usage/speed - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Thomas F.O'Connell
Subject Re: FAQ -- Index usage/speed
Date
Msg-id B46D902C-FB81-11D8-A844-000D93AE0944@sitening.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FAQ -- Index usage/speed  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: FAQ -- Index usage/speed  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-docs
I thought about that, and it seems like the upgrade path from 7.x ->
8.x is going to be slower than among any of the 7.x releases. 8.0 is
still several months away and it will probably be several months more
before people who are affected by this issue in production databases.

The other thing I thought about was a caveat in the 7.x documentation
under indexes, as it doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere. That would
keep it off the general FAQ but let folks using 7.x releases know about
it.

-tfo

On Aug 31, 2004, at 2:05 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Yes, 4.8 would be the right spot.  Not sure why we got so many reports
> recently though.
>
> However, with this fixed in 8.0, it probably isn't worth adding to the
> FAQ.


pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: FAQ -- Index usage/speed
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: FAQ -- Index usage/speed