Re: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema objects with one command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthias Schmidt
Subject Re: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema objects with one command
Date
Msg-id AC7B503A-7169-11D9-882A-000393AA75A0@mock-software.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema objects with one command  (Matthias Schmidt <schmidtm@mock-software.de>)
Responses Re: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema objects with one command
Re: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema objects with one command
List pgsql-hackers
Hi everybody,

I thought a little bit on possible GRANT syntax for granting to groups 
of objects.

In general, we have the following entities we can grant permissions to:

1. TABLE
2. DATABASE
3. FUNCTION
4. LANGUAGE
5. SCHEMA
6. TABLESPACE

since the requirement is to grant to all objects in a given schema 
(hope this still holds true) we are interested in:

TABLE
FUNCTION
LANGUAGE

The others (DATABASE, SCHEMA, TABLESPACE) are basically ruled out. I 
suspect that the majority of users like to grant to TABLE's and 
FUNCTIONS most of the time rather than LANGUAGE (correct me if i'm 
wrong).

This reduces the question to TABLE's and probably FUNCTION's. Now we 
have two choices:

a) accept some sort of wildcard for the grant on table syntax:   GRANT ... ON TABLE schema.*

b) use something like CASCADE for the grant on schema syntax:   GRANT ... ON SCHEMA CASCADE   In this case the grant on
schema'sneed to swallow the permissions   (SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE ...) which are intended for TABLES. This 
 
seems to me   kind of strange.

therefore I vote for Syntax a)

What do you think?

cheers,

Matthias



> Hi Tom + *,
>
> as I learned from severall posts this TODO splits into two distinct 
> TODO's
>
> TODO1: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema 
> objects with one command.
> TODO2: Assign Permissions to schemas wich get automatically inherited 
> by objects created in the schema.
>
> my questions are:
>
> a) should we pursue both of them?
> b) how can a syntax for TODO1 look like? Anchored at 'GRANT ... ON 
> SCHEMA' or 'GRANT ... ON <objecttype>' ?
>
> greetings,
>
> Matthias
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Matthias Schmidt
> Viehtriftstr. 49
>
> 67346 Speyer
> GERMANY
>
> Tel.: +49 6232 4867
> Fax.: +49 6232 640089
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of 
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>               http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthias Schmidt
Viehtriftstr. 49

67346 Speyer
GERMANY

Tel.: +49 6232 4867
Fax.: +49 6232 640089



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Group-count estimation statistics
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: -HEAD on FreeBSD 6-CURRENT build failures