On Jan 7, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 16:56 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
>
>> Not much more to send really.
>
> No problem. I can see what causes it, nothing more required, thanks.
> What I don't fully understand yet is why the error hasn't shown itself
> before, because it appears such a basic error.
>
Is anyone doing regular testing on non-linux? (to the extent that
this is a problem due to Solaris ideas about snprintf).
Robert Treat
http://www.omniti.com/
