On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Richard Yen <dba@richyen.com> wrote:
> Any ideas why the query planner chooses a different query plan when using prepared statements?
A prepared plan is the best one the planner can come up with *in
general* for the query in question. If the distribution of the values
you're querying against -- in your case, "owner" and "assignment" --
aren't relatively uniform, that plan is going to be suboptimal, if not
downright pathological, for the more outlying-ly distributed values.
Looking at your prepared plan, it seems that, on average, there are
177 rows for every "assignment", and 184 per "owner". As it turns
out, though, nearly a quarter of your table has an "owner" of -1.
It's not terribly surprising, with a table that big and a distribution
skew of that magnitude, that this query plan, with these arguments,
ends up pretty firmly in the "pathological" category.
rls
--
:wq
