On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:25, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>
>> You are supposed to work by having one "his branch" on his repo and
>> one "gleus branch" on your repo. Then you merge with his, and if you
>> make changes, he merges with yours, back and forth until you agree on
>> something that's good. At that point, you merge this (with squash,
>> please :P) into the main repository and push that.
>
> That seems like a nice way to waste a lot of time.
That really depends on the workflow. It can be pretty darn efficient,
particularly if you work with semi-working features.
But it does take a different mindset - if you work on it with the
traditional mindset, it's indeed a huge waste of time.
>>> If I understood correctly, yeah, I would like that to happen. The
>>> sooner, the better. I don't really know if we should use the same
>>> account or a different one. I actually don't care.
>>
>> Dave, any comment on that?
>
> The same account seems fine to me.
Ok. I'll look into that then.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/