On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> You are supposed to work by having one "his branch" on his repo and
> one "gleus branch" on your repo. Then you merge with his, and if you
> make changes, he merges with yours, back and forth until you agree on
> something that's good. At that point, you merge this (with squash,
> please :P) into the main repository and push that.
That seems like a nice way to waste a lot of time.
>> If I understood correctly, yeah, I would like that to happen. The
>> sooner, the better. I don't really know if we should use the same
>> account or a different one. I actually don't care.
>
> Dave, any comment on that?
The same account seems fine to me.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
