Le 18/08/2010 10:25, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>
>> You are supposed to work by having one "his branch" on his repo and
>> one "gleus branch" on your repo. Then you merge with his, and if you
>> make changes, he merges with yours, back and forth until you agree on
>> something that's good. At that point, you merge this (with squash,
>> please :P) into the main repository and push that.
>
The "gleus branch", as you named it, should be a fork of "his branch",
right?
> That seems like a nice way to waste a lot of time.
>
Yeah. I'm afraid all this will be a lot of work. Luis already worked
with git, so he's at least a bit familiar with it. Adeel didn't AFAICT,
so he'll need to learn all that. I also will need to learn a lot of it.
>>> If I understood correctly, yeah, I would like that to happen. The
>>> sooner, the better. I don't really know if we should use the same
>>> account or a different one. I actually don't care.
>>
>> Dave, any comment on that?
>
> The same account seems fine to me.
>
+1
--
Guillaume
http://www.postgresql.fr
http://dalibo.com
