Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4 - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4
Date
Msg-id AANLkTintU_j-9kkz+iKwNPbm+u9t8ahEiT+1qsr=+f6R@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4  (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
Responses Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgadmin-hackers
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
> Le 24/08/2010 13:01, Magnus Hagander a écrit :
>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>> This "disqualifies" pgAdmin3 from quite a lot of platforms. There
>>>> aren't that many that are on 8.4+ yet :-(
>>>
>>> If the packagers are willing to update pgAdmin to 1.12, it seems
>>> highly likely that they'll also update their PostgreSQL package to
>>> 8.4+ too. The distros with a conservative update policy (like Debian
>>> Stable) won't update either.
>>
>> It's probably going to make it very hard for a backports repository to
>> carry it though :( But I guess it could keep a backport of libpq as
>> well, since it's always backwards compatible.
>>
>
> Can't we just have it set a variable we could check with a #ifdef? We
> don't use PQconninfoParse in many files (actually, two). So it would be
> pretty easy to add the #ifdef line, so that it won't be a big issue for
> packagers.

Yeah, that's kind of what I was thinking. Sorry for re-opening this
discussion, but is my reading correct that we are *only* using it to
figure out if we have libpq version 9?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4