Re: extensible enum types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: extensible enum types
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinpnzqhQyMOBpXlODvhgy3P92TZAcSRh3BE-jTI@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: extensible enum types  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> This was debated when we implemented enums. As between 1,2 and 4 there is
> often not much to choose, as alignment padding makes it pretty much the
> same.  But any of them are more efficient than storing a numeric value or the
> label itself.

I was assuming the alternative was an integer, rather than a
numeric...  but yeah, a numeric or the label itself would definitely
be larger.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: extensible enum types
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>