On 10 July 2010 14:12, Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On ons, 2010-07-07 at 16:37 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here's the patch to add the 'xml_is_well_formed' function.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I suppose we should remove the function from contrib/xml2 at the same
>>> time.
>>>
>>
>> Yep
>
> Revised patch deleting the contrib/xml2 version of the function attached.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Mike Fowler
> Registered Linux user: 379787
>
sql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
>
Would a test for mismatched or undefined namespaces be necessary?
For example:
Mismatched namespace:
<pg:foo xmlns:pg="http://postgresql.org/stuff">bar</my:foo>
Undefined namespace when used in conjunction with IS DOCUMENT:
<pg:foo xmlns:my="http://postgresql.org/stuff">bar</pg:foo>
Also, having a look at the following example from the patch:
SELECT xml_is_well_formed('<local:data
xmlns:local="http://127.0.0.1";><local:piece id="1">number
one</local:piece><local:piece id="2" /></local:data>');xml_is_well_formed
--------------------t
(1 row)
Just wondering about that semi-colon after the namespace definition.
Thom