Thanks for reviewing!
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 13:40, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Did you check whether this updated the code for 100% of the object
> types where this could apply?
I walked through all the CREATE statements in the documentation and
these four seem to be the only ones that accept FOR REPLACE.
There's a similar case with CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS, maybe this is
worth covering in an updated patch too?
And if I change that, people might expect the same from DROP X IF EXISTS too?
> Also, I don't really like the way this spreads knowledge of the
> completionTag out all over the backend. I think it would be better to
> follow the existing model used by the COPY and COMMIT commands,
> whereby the return value indicates what happened and
> standard_ProcessUtility() uses that to set the command tag.
Right. I created this pattern after PerformPortalFetch() which already
took a completionTag argument. But your approach seems more
reasonable.
Regards,
Marti
