Re: SQL/MED with simple wrappers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: SQL/MED with simple wrappers
Date
Msg-id AANLkTingUR2OEBdh3syXdfefdSm+RYt48iTYxSPY7TEs@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to SQL/MED with simple wrappers  (Shigeru HANADA <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp>)
Responses Re: SQL/MED with simple wrappers
List pgsql-hackers
Hello

> 4) List of foreign connections
> Users (especially DBAs?) might want to see list of foreign connections.
> Currently postgresql_fdw provides its own connection list via
> postgresql_fdw_connections view.  Common view such as
> pg_foreign_connections would be needed?  If so, function which returns
> list of active connections would be necessary in FDW API.
>

+ list of foreign tables?

> 5) Routine mapping
> If a function in local query can be evaluated on the remote side in
> same semantics, it seems efficient to push the function down to the
> remote side.  But how can we know whether the function can be pushed
> down or not?  For such purpose, SQL/MED standard defines "routine
> mapping".  Should we implement routine mapping?
>

is it related to aggregate functions? If yes, this it can be really
significant help

>
> 7) Using cursor in postgresql_fdw
> postgresql_fdw fetches all of the result tuples from the foreign
> server in the first pgIterate() call.  It could cause out-of-memory if
> the result set was huge.  If libpq supports protocol-level cursor,
> postgresql_fdw will be able to divide result set into some sets and
> lower the usage of memory.  Or should we use declare implicit cursor
> with DECLARE statement?  One connection can be used by multiple
> ForeignScan nodes in a local query alternately.  An issue is that
> cursor requires implicit transaction block.  Is it OK to start
> transaction automatically?

I don't know why DECLARE statement is problem? Can you explain it, please.

regards

Pavel Stehule


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date:
Subject: Re: security hook on authorization
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: find -path isn't portable