Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't unblock SIGQUIT in the SIGQUIT handler This was possibly - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't unblock SIGQUIT in the SIGQUIT handler This was possibly
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinex8vqBidr7jiCVJbTUsQ7QAL1M8Kq67Y9vPaG@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't unblock SIGQUIT in the SIGQUIT handler This was possibly
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Peter Eisentraut <petere@postgresql.org> wrote:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Don't unblock SIGQUIT in the SIGQUIT handler
>
> This was possibly linked to a deadlock-like situation in glibc syslog code
> invoked by the ereport call in quickdie().  In any case, a signal handler
> should not unblock its own signal unless there is a specific reason to.
>
> Modified Files:
> --------------
>    pgsql/src/backend/tcop:
>        postgres.c (r1.577 -> r1.578)
>        (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/tcop/postgres.c?r1=1.577&r2=1.578)
>    pgsql/src/include/libpq:
>        pqsignal.h (r1.35 -> r1.36)
>        (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/libpq/pqsignal.h?r1=1.35&r2=1.36)

Why wasn't this patch backported? Recently my customer encountered
the bug which this patch fixed, in 8.3.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Date:
Subject: ECPG question about PREPARE and EXECUTE
Next
From: Viktor Valy
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO Alter Table Rename Constraint