Re: WIP: extensible enums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: WIP: extensible enums
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinef2UYmru5aAOc3oxjKDkw_XU1+Sraroh4y29i@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: extensible enums  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: WIP: extensible enums
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> Efficiency has  always been one of the major reasons for using enums, so
> it's important that we make them extensible without badly affecting
> performance.

on that note is it worthwhile backpatching recent versions to allocate
enums with even numbered oids? That way people binary upgrading can
get the benefit of the optimization they should qualify for...

merlin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: default_statistics_target WAS: max_wal_senders must die
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: default_statistics_target WAS: max_wal_senders must die