On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de> wrote:
> Lost it a little from my radar, but here's is a first shot on this issue
> now. The patch creates a new CONSTRAINT_NOTNULL contype and assigns all
> required information for the NOT NULL constraint to it. Currently the
> constraint records the attribute number it belongs to and manages the
> inheritance properties. Passes regression tests with some adjustments to
> pg_constraint output.
Confirmed that this tests fine against commit id
0dca7d2f70872a242d4430c4c3aa01ba8dbd4a8c
I also wrote a little test script and verified that it throws an error
when I try to remove a constraint from the parent table.
Should an explicit test be added for this?
There are some spelling and grammar errors in comments that I can help
fix if you want the help.
-selena
--
http://chesnok.com/daily - me
