Re: leaky views, yet again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: leaky views, yet again
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinVSbWTrvjgzkiBnzRPQCLU=e-5ba+nwXOjEQna@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: leaky views, yet again  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
Responses Re: leaky views, yet again
List pgsql-hackers
2010/7/21 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>:
>> On the other hand, if it's enough from a performance
>> point of view to review and mark only a few built-in functions like
>> index operators, maybe it's ok.
>>
> I also think it is a worthful idea to try as a proof-of-concept.

Yeah.  So, should we mark this patch as Returned with Feedback, and
you can submit a proof-of-concept patch for the next CF?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: leaky views, yet again
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: psql \conninfo command (was: Patch: psql \whoami option)